<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Abhinav Saxena — Essays</title><description>Essays on philosophy, artificial intelligence, mind, ethics and epistemology.</description><link>https://abhinavsaxena.in/</link><language>en</language><item><title>Knowing Without a Knower</title><link>https://abhinavsaxena.in/essays/knowing-without-a-knower/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://abhinavsaxena.in/essays/knowing-without-a-knower/</guid><description>Every classical theory of knowledge assumes a subject who believes and can be asked why. What happens to the concept when the outputs are true, the process is reliable, and there is no one to ask?</description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>knowledge</category><category>justification</category><category>language models</category><category>Gettier</category><category>reliabilism</category><author>Abhinav Saxena</author></item><item><title>The Responsibility Gap Is a Map, Not a Hole</title><link>https://abhinavsaxena.in/essays/the-responsibility-gap-is-a-map/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://abhinavsaxena.in/essays/the-responsibility-gap-is-a-map/</guid><description>The standard worry is that autonomous systems open a gap into which responsibility vanishes. I argue that the gap is better read as a map of where control and knowledge actually sit — and that reading it is the philosophical task.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>responsibility</category><category>responsibility gap</category><category>accountability</category><category>autonomous systems</category><author>Abhinav Saxena</author></item><item><title>Agency Before Consciousness</title><link>https://abhinavsaxena.in/essays/agency-before-consciousness/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://abhinavsaxena.in/essays/agency-before-consciousness/</guid><description>The features that make behaviour count as action — sensitivity to reasons, flexibility, revision — can each be specified without mentioning experience. If they can be built without it, what did consciousness ever contribute to agency?</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>agency</category><category>consciousness</category><category>intentional stance</category><category>reasons</category><author>Abhinav Saxena</author></item><item><title>What Nyāya Can Teach a Language Model</title><link>https://abhinavsaxena.in/essays/what-nyaya-can-teach-a-language-model/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://abhinavsaxena.in/essays/what-nyaya-can-teach-a-language-model/</guid><description>Western epistemology tends to reduce testimony to inference about the speaker. The Nyāya school asked instead about the speaker&apos;s standing. That question, I argue, is the right one to ask of a model&apos;s answer.</description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>testimony</category><category>Nyāya</category><category>śabda</category><category>pramāṇa</category><category>trust</category><author>Abhinav Saxena</author></item><item><title>The Transparent Tool</title><link>https://abhinavsaxena.in/essays/the-transparent-tool/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://abhinavsaxena.in/essays/the-transparent-tool/</guid><description>Heidegger observed that a tool in use withdraws from attention; we notice the hammer only when it breaks. What happens when the tool that withdraws is one that speaks?</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>phenomenology</category><category>Heidegger</category><category>tools</category><category>extended mind</category><category>technology</category><author>Abhinav Saxena</author></item></channel></rss>