Ada Lovelace's Note G: the Engine 'has no pretensions to originate'
Ada Lovelace, Sketch of the Analytical Engine invented by Charles Babbage, Esq. By L. F. Menabrea, of Turin, Officer of the Military Engineers. With notes by the Translator (1843)
The first careful statement of what a computing machine does and does not do, by the person who saw furthest into what it could become.
Why it matters
Ada Lovelace’s notes to her translation of Menabrea’s account of Babbage’s Analytical Engine contain both the most famous scepticism about machines and one of the boldest visions of them. In Note A she imagines that the engine, given the right representations, might compose elaborate pieces of music of any degree of complexity. In Note G she warns against exaggerated ideas of its powers: the engine has no pretensions whatever to originate anything; it can do whatever we know how to order it to perform.
It is worth reading the two together, because the warning is not a failure of imagination. Lovelace understood that a machine could produce outputs of great richness; her point is about their source. What the engine does is what its operations were ordered to do.
Her sentence has been argued over ever since, by Turing among others, and learning systems complicate it: nobody ordered a language model to produce any particular sentence. But the question she asks, what in the machine’s operation explains its output, is exactly the right one. My answer for current language models is that what explains their answers is likelihood under learned text, and that this is why their answers, however original-seeming, do not carry the warrant of testimony.
"The Analytical Engine has no pretensions whatever to originate any thing"
Notes by the Translator, Note G
It is desirable to guard against the possibility of exaggerated ideas that might arise as to the powers of the Analytical Engine. In considering any new subject, there is frequently a tendency, first, to overrate what we find to be already interesting or remarkable; and, secondly, by a sort of natural reaction, to undervalue the true state of the case, when we do discover that our notions have surpassed those that were really tenable.
The Analytical Engine has no pretensions whatever to originate any thing. It can do whatever we know how to order it to perform. It can follow analysis; but it has no power of anticipating any analytical relations or truths. Its province is to assist us in making available what we are already acquainted with. This it is calculated to effect primarily and chiefly of course, through its executive faculties; but it is likely to exert an indirect and reciprocal influence on science itself in another manner. For, in so distributing and combining the truths and the formulæ of analysis, that they may become most easily and rapidly amenable to the mechanical combinations of the engine, the relations and the nature of many subjects in that science are necessarily thrown into new lights, and more profoundly investigated. This is a decidedly indirect, and a somewhat speculative, consequence of such an invention. It is however pretty evident, on general principles, that in devising for mathematical truths a new form in which to record and throw themselves out for actual use, views are likely to be induced, which should again react on the more theoretical phase of the subject. There are in all extensions of human power, or additions to human knowledge, various collateral influences, besides the main and primary object attained.
The engine might compose music
Notes by the Translator, Note A
The operating mechanism can even be thrown into action independently of any object to operate upon (although of course no result could then be developed). Again, it might act upon other things besides number, were objects found whose mutual fundamental relations could be expressed by those of the abstract science of operations, and which should be also susceptible of adaptations to the action of the operating notation and mechanism of the engine. Supposing, for instance, that the fundamental relations of pitched sounds in the science of harmony and of musical composition were susceptible of such expression and adaptations, the engine might compose elaborate and scientific pieces of music of any degree of complexity or extent.
The engine weaves algebraical patterns
Notes by the Translator, Note A
The distinctive characteristic of the Analytical Engine, and that which has rendered it possible to endow mechanism with such extensive faculties as bid fair to make this engine the executive right-hand of abstract algebra, is the introduction into it of the principle which Jacquard devised for regulating, by means of punched cards, the most complicated patterns in the fabrication of brocaded stuffs. It is in this that the distinction between the two engines lies. Nothing of the sort exists in the Difference Engine. We may say most aptly that the Analytical Engine weaves algebraical patterns just as the Jacquard-loom weaves flowers and leaves.
Questions for discussion
- Lovelace writes that the Analytical Engine has no pretensions to originate anything. What would it mean for a machine to originate something, and could a present-day AI system do it?
- Lovelace also imagined the engine composing music. Is there a tension between that hope and her claim that it originates nothing?
- Alan Turing later answered what he called Lady Lovelace's objection. Is it an objection about what machines can do, or about how we should describe what they do?
The text and its source
- Edition
- Offprint "Extracted from the 'Scientific Memoirs', vol. III" (London: printed by Richard and John E. Taylor, 1843), as transcribed in Project Gutenberg eBook #75107 (HTML only; no plain-text file is offered).
- Source
- Project Gutenberg
- Status
- Public domain: published 1843; Lovelace died 1852, Menabrea 1896.
- Notes on the text
- The quoted sentences are Lovelace's own (Notes A and G are signed "A. A. L."), not Menabrea's. The HTML was converted to text programmatically: page-number spans ([Pg 57] etc.) were dropped and <i>/<em> rendered as _underscores_ (e.g. _originate_, _know how to order it_). Exact wording: the 1843 text reads "originate any thing" (two words), not "anything". The brief suggested Wikisource or fourmilab.ch; Project Gutenberg now has a proofread edition of the 1843 offprint, which is used instead. Passage 3 ends mid-paragraph after the Jacquard sentence.
Questions it bears on
Terms
Cite this page
Ada Lovelace. Sketch of the Analytical Engine invented by Charles Babbage, Esq. By L. F. Menabrea, of Turin, Officer of the Military Engineers. With notes by the Translator. In: Ada Lovelace's Note G: the Engine 'has no pretensions to originate', abhinavsaxena.in library. https://abhinavsaxena.in/library/lovelace-note-g/