Gottlob Frege
1848–1925 · Wismar, Mecklenburg-Schwerin (now Germany) · also Frege, Friedrich Ludwig Gottlob Frege, F. L. G. Frege, G. Frege
German mathematician and philosopher who invented modern logic and the distinction between sense and reference, tried to derive arithmetic from logic, and is often called the father of analytic philosophy.
Key ideas
- A new logic. Frege analysed sentences as functions applied to arguments, not as subject and predicate, and introduced quantifiers that can be nested. His Begriffsschrift of 1879 set out a formal system of quantificational logic with explicit rules of proof.
- Logicism. Arithmetic, Frege held, is part of logic: its concepts can be defined and its truths proved from logical laws alone, so its truths are analytic, not synthetic as Kant thought.
- Numbers belong to concepts. A statement of number is about a concept: “There are eight planets” says that the concept planet has eight instances. Numbers themselves are objects, not ideas in anyone’s mind.
- The context principle. Frege’s rule in the Foundations of Arithmetic is never to ask for the meaning of a word in isolation, only in the context of a proposition.
- Sense and reference. An expression has a reference, the thing it stands for, and a sense, the way that thing is presented. The distinction explains how an identity such as the morning star is the evening star can be informative.
- Thoughts and the third realm. The sense of a sentence is a thought, which is objective and timeless: neither a physical thing nor an idea in a mind. Frege drew a sharp line between logic and psychology.
- Basic Law V and the paradox. Russell showed in 1902 that Frege’s Basic Law V, which governs extensions of concepts, yields a contradiction. The paradox ended the logicist system of the Basic Laws of Arithmetic.
Gottlob Frege (1848–1925) was a German mathematician and philosopher who invented modern logic and, in doing so, gave analytic philosophy much of its method and many of its problems. He is the source of the distinction between sense and reference, of the attempt to derive arithmetic from logic, and of the system in which Bertrand Russell found his paradox. He was largely ignored in his lifetime.
He was born in Wismar on the Baltic coast, studied at Jena, where Ernst Abbe became his mentor, and took a doctorate in mathematics at Göttingen in 1873. He spent his career at Jena, as extraordinary professor from 1879, the year of his first book. He retired near the end of the First World War and died at Bad Kleinen, in Mecklenburg, in 1925.
What did Frege invent?
The traditional logic descended from Aristotle analysed sentences as subject and predicate, and could not display the difference between the two readings of Everyone admires someone: that each person admires somebody or other, or that one person is admired by everyone. In the Begriffsschrift (“concept-script”, 1879) Frege treated predicates as functions from objects to truth-values and introduced quantifiers that can be nested, so that the two readings receive different symbolism. The book set out a formal system with explicit rules of proof, partly to realise the idea of Leibniz of a universal formal language. Its two-dimensional notation, which contemporaries found hard to read, did not catch on. See logic and propositional logic.
What was logicism?
Kant had held that arithmetic is synthetic. Frege held that it is analytic, derivable from the laws of logic alone, and argued so in The Foundations of Arithmetic (1884). A statement of number, he said, is about a concept: There are eight planets says that the concept planet has eight instances. Numbers are objects, not ideas in anyone’s head, a Platonism he defended against psychologism. What is now called Hume’s principle says that the number of Fs equals the number of Gs if and only if the Fs and Gs can be paired one to one. The book also gives the context principle: “never ask for the meaning of a word in isolation, but only in the context of a proposition.” See analytic and synthetic and a priori and a posteriori.
What is the difference between sense and reference?
In “On Sense and Reference” (1892) Frege asked how an identity can be informative. The morning star is the evening star tells us something; The morning star is the morning star does not, yet both name Venus. His answer is that each expression has a reference, the thing it stands for, and a sense, a mode of presentation of it. A sentence’s sense is a thought and its reference a truth-value. In reports of belief a name refers to its usual sense, so swapping coreferring names can change the truth-value. See sense and reference.
What are thoughts?
In “The Thought” (1918) Frege held that thoughts exist in a timeless “third realm”, apart from both the mental and the physical. He insisted on a sharp line between logic and psychology, a line Husserl also drew, though how far Husserl owed it to him is disputed.
What did Russell’s letter show?
On 16 June 1902, as the second volume of the Basic Laws of Arithmetic was being printed, Russell wrote that a contradiction could be derived in the system of the first. The source was Basic Law V, which says that two concepts have the same extension just in case they apply to the same things. Consider the extension of the concept being an extension that is not a member of itself: it belongs to itself if and only if it does not. Frege, “thunderstruck” in his own word, added an appendix in which he wrote: “Hardly anything more unfortunate can befall a scientific writer than to have one of the foundations of his edifice shaken after the work is finished.” His repairs failed, and in 1924 he gave up logicism for a Kantian account of arithmetic based on intuition of space.
Much survives, however. If Hume’s principle replaces Basic Law V, the axioms of arithmetic can still be derived. This is Frege’s theorem, which Crispin Wright, George Boolos and others developed into neo-logicism.
What was his influence?
Russell’s Principles of Mathematics (1903) brought Frege wider attention. Wittgenstein visited him at Jena in 1911 and Rudolf Carnap attended his lectures. Wittgenstein and Russell carried his logic into analytic philosophy, and Michael Dummett cited the Foundations as the place to pinpoint the linguistic turn. His ideas remain the base of philosophy of language. UGC NET Unit 6 lists his sense and reference; see the UGC NET guide.
A private diary of 1924, published only in 1994, expresses hostility to Jews and wishes that they would leave Germany or at least lose certain political rights. Dummett, who had admired Frege, was shocked. None of this enters his logic, but an honest account records it.
How to start reading Frege
No Frege text is in this site’s library, because the standard English translations are modern and not free online. They include J. L. Austin’s translation of the Foundations and Michael Beaney’s The Frege Reader (1997). Start with the introduction to the Foundations, then read “On Sense and Reference” and “The Thought”, and leave the Basic Laws until last.
Works
- Begriffsschrift (Concept-Script) (1879)
Introduces his formal logic, with quantifiers and explicit rules of proof.
- The Foundations of Arithmetic (Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik) (1884)
His case for logicism. The standard English translation is J. L. Austin's (1953).
- Function and Concept (1891)
A paper distinguishing functions, concepts and objects.
- On Sense and Reference (Über Sinn und Bedeutung) (1892)
His most cited paper, in the Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik.
- Basic Laws of Arithmetic (Grundgesetze der Arithmetik) (1893, 1903)
Two volumes carrying out the logicist proof in formal notation; the second ends with his response to Russell's paradox.
- The Thought (Der Gedanke) (1918)
Argues that thoughts exist objectively, apart from the mental and the physical. Michael Beaney's The Frege Reader (1997) collects selections from his writings.
Influence
Around the same time
Questions people ask
What is Frege's distinction between sense and reference?
The reference of an expression is the thing it stands for, and its sense is the way that thing is presented. The morning star and the evening star are both Venus, but they have different senses, which is why the identity statement tells us something while a statement that the morning star is the morning star does not. Frege extended the distinction to sentences: the sense of a sentence is a thought, and its reference is its truth-value.
What was Russell's paradox and how did it affect Frege?
In June 1902, as the second volume of the Basic Laws was going to press, Bertrand Russell wrote to Frege that a contradiction could be derived in the system of the first volume. It follows from Basic Law V, which lets any concept determine an extension, by considering the extension of the concept of being an extension that is not a member of itself. Frege added an appendix acknowledging the problem, his attempts at repair failed, and in his last years he gave up logicism.
What is logicism?
Logicism is the thesis that arithmetic is part of logic: its concepts can be defined, and its truths proved, from logical laws alone. Frege argued for it in The Foundations of Arithmetic (1884) and tried to carry it out in the Basic Laws of Arithmetic. His system proved inconsistent, but later philosophers showed that much of it survives, and neo-logicists such as Crispin Wright continue the programme.
Why is Frege called the father of analytic philosophy?
Frege’s logic and his work on meaning, reference and thought gave analytic philosophy its main tools, and Michael Dummett cited The Foundations of Arithmetic as the place to pinpoint the linguistic turn. He was largely ignored in his lifetime. Peano, Russell and Wittgenstein introduced his work to later generations.
Further reading
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophyplato.stanford.edu/entries/frege/
- Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophyiep.utm.edu/frege/
- Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottlob_Frege